From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 19 12:13: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C6515149 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:13:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA00611; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:06:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199907191906.MAA00611@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Per Lundberg Cc: Alex Zepeda , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: glibc In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:38:54 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:06:40 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: > > > Perhaps if you explain what it is you're trying to accomplish, there might > > be an easier option than porting *shudder* glibc? > > I need a libc 100% compatible with glibc to make porting (from Linux) > easier. And, as a side note, I think both FreeBSD and Linux would benefit > of having compatible libc:s. Uh, if you are using libc correctly, there should be no porting issues at all. > Perhaps porting BSD libc to Linux would be easier? Perhaps you should just fix the applications in the first place? -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message