From owner-freebsd-isdn Sun Dec 5 9:22:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F4614CF7 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 1999 09:22:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10096 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 1999 18:22:46 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id SAA24602; Sun, 5 Dec 1999 18:22:31 +0100 (MET) To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FOR ERNST Re: ISDN problem on FreeBSD 3.2 References: <38491594.92396BCC@znerd.demon.nl> <4.2.2.19991204153035.00ae6190@pop.roberts.nl> <19991205121853.B65238@server.nostromo.in-berlin.de> From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: "H. Eckert"'s message of "Sun, 5 Dec 1999 12:18:54 +0100" Date: 05 Dec 1999 18:22:30 +0100 Message-ID: <0vr9h1uwtl.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "H. Eckert" writes: > At least you could have found the "delete-line" or "delete-paragraph" > functions of your editor instead of mailing ~50kB to everyone :-((( As far as I understand it the quotation was done on intention. Luke was trying to get the message to the person in question this way because his or her email address was not valid. You might still question whether or not this was a good thing to do but there is no need to start flaming. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message