From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 29 05:22:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547E816A4DA for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047D143D46 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:22:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBB9F1BDF; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:22:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcneil.com Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (triton.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kT6BdZ1bvOse; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E10BF194C; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:22:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20060829150400.739ae7d2@localhost> References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060828161538.GI89053@vision.anyware> <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> <20060829150400.739ae7d2@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:22:36 -0700 Message-Id: <1156828956.62479.4.camel@triton.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:22:39 -0000 On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:04 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:45:01 +0200 > "Ronald Klop" wrote: > > > Maybe it is possible to repocopy eclipse to eclipse31. And change the > > depending ports for the new location. > > Just an idea. Don't know how much work it is. > > or, given that most ports that depend on 3.1.2 wont work out of the box with > 3.2 , just call this one eclipse32 ? > > I remember seeing an email on this list suggesting against doing any of > this.... but IMVHO, is better to have both out there and then have a reason to > upgrade all the plugins ... otherwise I can see we may have a gap when we have > java/eclipse (3.2) but no compatible plugins available yet.... The big problem that I see is there are a number of plugins that have decayed and no longer install. At lease I've seen posts to eclipse@ about this. Perhaps they have been updated by now, but what I saw was that the download was no longer valid. If this is the case, then just update them all to 3.2 or compatible. If there is enough interest, then make an eclipse31. But it seems like it will just get harder to maintain the older version as time marches on.