From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 7 2:18:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.sunesi.net (ns1.sunesi.net [196.15.192.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4690B15573 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 02:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nbm@sunesi.net) Received: from nbm by ns1.sunesi.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 126WSO-000L4e-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:17:20 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 12:17:20 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: R Joseph Wright Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any Ideas When We're Going to See 4.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20000107121720.C80425@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <0025685D.0052E516.00@rslhub.raytheon.co.uk> <20000105214755.C14126@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <387437A7.58A7F307@nwlink.com> <20000106093321.A66645@mithrandr.moria.org> <3874DCD2.748AECAB@nwlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <3874DCD2.748AECAB@nwlink.com> Organization: Rhodes University Computer Users' Society X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu 2000-01-06 (10:20), R Joseph Wright wrote: > I thought the configuration and compiling of a 4.0 kernel was supposed > to be about the same as with 3.x. It's the same, except people may be used to doing the kernel after world, whereas currently we need to do the kernel before the world. > > As to differences between 3.x and 4.0, there's a lot of work on > > the ATA subsystem, network devices, pccard stuff, new gcc, newer > > ntp, and many vm related changes. > > You mean stuff that people like me would never notice? Maybe not. What would you notice? (: Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message