From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:04:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27DA16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6C643D46 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080BC1A3C1A; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F4BA513A2; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:04:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:04:21 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Angel Blazquez Message-ID: <20051231050421.GA66671@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs server overload (nfsd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:04:22 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:19:10AM +0100, Angel Blazquez wrote: > Hello, >=20 > We are expecting incredible overload in a NFS server. A top shows nfsd > consuming most of the CPU: >=20 > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COM= MAND > 6000 root -8 0 1204K 660K biord 1 124:15 27.88% 27.88% nf= sd > 6002 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 124:18 17.58% 17.58% nf= sd > 6006 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:38 10.21% 10.21% nf= sd > 6005 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:36 7.47% 7.47% nf= sd > 6003 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:08 4.15% 4.15% nf= sd > 6001 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:16 2.83% 2.83% nf= sd >=20 > Memory looks fine: >=20 > Mem: 27M Active, 910M Inact, 136M Wired, 51M Cache, 112M Buf, 1828K Free > Swap: 2048M Total, 72K Used, 2048M Free >=20 > Typing in the nfs server (console/ssh) becomes terrible, the server does > not reply well. >=20 > We are running this nfs server in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 on a Compaq > Proliant server with a Compaq Smart Array 5300 that comunicates with a > array of disks: You will experience *much* better performance if you upgrade to 6.0. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDthFUWry0BWjoQKURAguGAJ9PP+YaF6A0sXAbjldUDCaT4Zn8tgCdHD57 EXNcIMsutK3YjBln1m+MOfQ= =0i6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--