From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 10:51:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:51:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A7E43D6D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com) Received: from [213.51.128.132] (port=60417 helo=smtp1.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CbzPj-0000OM-K4; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:19 +0100 Received: from cc740438-a.deven1.ov.home.nl ([82.75.136.183]:3468 helo=[192.168.1.42]) by smtp1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CbzPa-0003yl-5j; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100 Message-ID: <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Hopper References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> In-Reply-To: <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:51:22 -0000 Justin Hopper wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: > >>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper >> wrote: >> >>>Two questions: >>> >>>1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails >>>binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? >> >>Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... > > > I'm confused. I've been running and developing on 5.x for a few months > now, and I'm pretty sure that multiple IPs are not supported (it's > always possible that I've missed something...). I was curious if Poul > or anyone else had plans to put the functionality into the base system > in the near future? Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself before you are rude towards others. > >>>2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production >>>environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had >>>with it? >> >>I toyed with it at home without a single issue. Still, in a hosting >>environment I'd use 5.x Are you sure you toyed with it? And in a production environment, I'd still recommend 4.10. > > The patch from Pawel that I was looking at was "against-CURRENT", so I > was assuming that was for 5, and not some 4.x-CURRENT branch? Correct. Pawel's patches haven't been incorporated for various reasons, but I'm not a committer, so I won't give them. There have been several threads on the list questioning this over the last year and a half. I have run the MIP patch and found no problems. I believe there is a race condition that it introduces, but that could be irrelevant / incorrect information. I'll leave it up to PJD and others to provide any more information if it is necessary and to you to search the lists for the other relevant threads. Kind regards, Devon H. O'Dell