Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:48 +0400 From: Ilya Bakulin <webmaster@kibab.com> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: geom@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks Message-ID: <20100831150148.494d72b6@kibab-work.smstraffic.ru> In-Reply-To: <86eidgi7cn.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86wrry1hwv.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100828130912.48205a47@kibab.com> <20100828195024.3d671a76@kibab.com> <20100828204415.6875b4ec@kibab.com> <86bp8kjr7i.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100830155638.710f8871@kibab-work.smstraffic.ru> <86eidgi7cn.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:59:52 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > Ilya Bakulin <webmaster@kibab.com> writes: > > So it begins at sector #63, but physical 4096-block begins at logical > > sector 64. That's why I shifted gnop by 1 sector. > > Why aren't you using the whole disk? I just wanted to be closer to the real usage scenario. > WD Green, even their non-AF disks (like the WD20EADS I tested) suck. OK. Let's live with it :-) May you suggest any other tests? Or let's live with sucking WD Green and look for other 4096K-sector models from other manufacturers? -- Regards, Ilya Bakulin http://kibab.com xmpp://kibab612@jabber.ru [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkx84SIACgkQo9vlj1oadwh0GQCghxZKYvQ1vRjrqH7NqVQuuXMO V5AAnj6caX/k+S5RaLHWQ67qeo56D8eE =NF+w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100831150148.494d72b6>