From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 6 5:59:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from eth0-gw.poli.hu (eth0-gw.poli.hu [195.199.8.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB9D14FB0 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 05:59:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mauzi@faber.poli.hu) Received: from faber.poli.hu ([195.199.8.29]) by eth0-gw.poli.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11uyfU-0000tG-00 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 14:59:08 +0100 Received: from mauzi (helo=localhost) by faber.poli.hu with local-esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11uyfU-0008D4-00 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 14:59:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) From: Egervary Gergely To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrom speed adjustment ioctl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've just hacked a new ioctl into the ATAPI cdrom driver, which > lets the user to specify (pronounce: ``slow down'' :) the speed > of todays' extremely high speed drives. ok, so i see you like the idea - so the question is: should we implement a new ioctl for it, or - as like scsi - should we use a program like camcontrol for it? basically i prefer doing both, as the current atapi implementation includes the most important atapi commands, it could be more complete, and i think it's nice to have a user space program for sending packet commands... :) -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message