From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 27 01:30:35 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F202516A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B7643FE0
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:30:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5679966C8E; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:30:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:30:31 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Guy Van Sanden <guy.van.sanden@pandora.be>
Message-ID: <20031127093031.GB63927@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <1069924680.2858.15.camel@cronos.home.vsb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1069924680.2858.15.camel@cronos.home.vsb>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.x downgrade recommendation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:30:35 -0000


--xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Guy Van Sanden wrote:
> I've moved to the 5.x branch since 5.0-RLEASE, currently, I'm running
> 5.1-RELEASE.
>=20
> I'm now considering if I will do the upgrade to 5.2-RELEASE, or
> reinstall the system with 4.9 or 4.10.
> The 5.x branch seems to remain rather unstable longer then I had
> anticipated.
>=20
> What would you guys recommend, wait out for 5.3 (which is supposed to be
> 4.x-like stable), or move back to 4.9 (or 4.10 soon).
>=20
> Will 5.2 be much better?

Hopefully, but it's not yet designated as -STABLE because it needs to
become better-proven.  Stick with the 4.x branch if you don't want to
deal with this kind of problem.

Kris


--xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/xcQ2Wry0BWjoQKURAgr1AKC+yXRyDas4MqkfMVR4YELXtYqHpgCgq2/C
q9A3xm/ctaVMM+WeYjJXVes=
=TuHA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE--