Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:30:31 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Guy Van Sanden <guy.van.sanden@pandora.be> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.x downgrade recommendation Message-ID: <20031127093031.GB63927@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1069924680.2858.15.camel@cronos.home.vsb> References: <1069924680.2858.15.camel@cronos.home.vsb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > I've moved to the 5.x branch since 5.0-RLEASE, currently, I'm running > 5.1-RELEASE. >=20 > I'm now considering if I will do the upgrade to 5.2-RELEASE, or > reinstall the system with 4.9 or 4.10. > The 5.x branch seems to remain rather unstable longer then I had > anticipated. >=20 > What would you guys recommend, wait out for 5.3 (which is supposed to be > 4.x-like stable), or move back to 4.9 (or 4.10 soon). >=20 > Will 5.2 be much better? Hopefully, but it's not yet designated as -STABLE because it needs to become better-proven. Stick with the 4.x branch if you don't want to deal with this kind of problem. Kris --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/xcQ2Wry0BWjoQKURAgr1AKC+yXRyDas4MqkfMVR4YELXtYqHpgCgq2/C q9A3xm/ctaVMM+WeYjJXVes= =TuHA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031127093031.GB63927>