From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 20 21:39:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA1716A403 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8223513C45B for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3KLcZTt093454; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:38:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:37:48 -0500 To: Grant Peel , From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:39:14 -0000 At 11:43 AM 4/20/2007, Grant Peel wrote: >Hi all, > >I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs >using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either >directly to me or to the list. > >We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have >been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam >servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by. > >We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda. >Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam. >Does anyone out there have thought on either or both of these? Usability? >Reliability? Total Cost of ownership? Integration issues? > >Any thoughts will be appreciated, If your volume of mail is >50000 per day don't use the baracuda. It won't keep up. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.