Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:55:32 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr1@flash.net> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/2943: standard-supfile missing src-release and src-tools Message-ID: <199703120155.UAA01343@istari.flash.net> In-Reply-To: Mail from '"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>' dated: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 22:50:03 -0800 (PST)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> > Subject: Re: conf/2943: standard-supfile missing src-release and src-tools > > The following reply was made to PR conf/2943; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> > To: sjr1@flash.net > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: conf/2943: standard-supfile missing src-release and src-tools > Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 22:44:49 -0800 > > > *** share/examples/sup/standard-supfile.orig Mon Mar 10 22:36:51 1997 > > --- share/examples/sup/standard-supfile Mon Mar 10 22:37:50 1997 > > Actually, these files are entirely obsolete and should probably just > be removed. We don't offer sources via sup anymore and cvsup's > configuration files are rather different. I'm confused. I'm presently using sup (sup.freebsd.org) to maintain my private source code tree... > Anyone mind if I just nuke the whole examples/sup directory in > response to this PR? Also, I find this a little disturbing. Currently sup is located in /usr/src/usr.sbin/sup and as such I believe it is "supported". I don't see cvsup anywhere in the /usr/src tree (I believe that it is still only available as a port). I think that cvsup should be imported into /usr/src/contrib and built as part on the normal build before sup goes away... Thanks, -SR
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703120155.UAA01343>