From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Nov 24 14:39:31 1995
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA28014
          for security-outgoing; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 14:39:31 -0800
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA28002
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 14:39:25 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA01327; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 14:20:05 -0800
Message-Id: <199511242220.OAA01327@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Randy Berndt <rberndt@nething.com>, security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: I wonder how much trouble something like this would be to do? :) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Nov 1995 09:19:16 PST."
             <2511.817233556@time.cdrom.com> 
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 22:20:05 +0000
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Pathetic given that IP security does exactly the same thing as DEC is proposing.
Call your local router vendor to see when they're releasing it (I could tell
you when cisco is, but then I'd have to kill myself).

There should be several near-PD implementations of IPsec for Free/NetBSD
coming out shortly.