From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 13 16:05:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAB516A4CE; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:05:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [69.17.104.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C361543D41; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [69.17.104.113]) by sasami.jurai.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3DG5mkP095935; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:05:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:05:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" X-X-Sender: winter@sasami.jurai.net To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20050413170217.P95037@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20050413120523.Y3762@sasami.jurai.net> References: <200504130030.j3D0UJDN082846@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050413170217.P95037@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (sasami.jurai.net [69.17.104.113]); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:05:50 -0400 (EDT) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 tap.4 src/sys/net if_tap.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:05:52 -0000 On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: > Is there any reason to require suser() at all for open, given that our > devfs permissions are conservative? Maybe we should remove that suser() > and add a couple for specific tapioctl() calls that are more sensitive? Its an exclusive open device. -- 10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00