From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 25 21:00:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522C21065679 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BD48FC1D for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2PL07MI026661 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:00:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2PL07DY026660; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:00:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:00:07 GMT Message-Id: <200903252100.n2PL07DY026660@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Cc: Subject: Re: ports/131878: www/squid: Bug with kerberos heimdal negotiate auth. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:00:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/131878; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: Thomas-Martin Seck Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/131878: www/squid: Bug with kerberos heimdal negotiate auth. Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:55:00 +0100 > > Any update on this PR? Thomas, you ever got a word back from the > > submitter? > > Not regarding my latest feedback which means to check whether we are not > actually compiling on a big endian architecture since the submitter's > patch assumes that we are always little endian. (This is probably not > correct for at least FreeBSD-sparc64, is it?) I'd therefore prefer to > check what configure already found out about endianness. This is equally > straightforward and I'll update the squid/squid30 ports within the next > few days accordingly. I plan to submit this patch upstream, too. Sounds good. So do you want me to commit your patch from 8 Mar 2009 19:48:30 ? -- Pav Lucistnik Your sig line (k) was stolen! -more- There is a puff of smoke!