From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 5 19:14:31 1995 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA04051 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 19:14:31 -0700 Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA04044 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 19:14:27 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA18879; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 19:16:44 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 19:16:44 -0700 Message-Id: <199510060216.TAA18879@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: A.C.P.M.Kalker@student.utwente.nl CC: ports@freefall.freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Alain Kalker on Thu, 5 Oct 1995 15:00:01 +0100 (MET)) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ncftp2/pkg COMMENT From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > It really isn't necessary to put the latest version on the CD, as long * > as we have a matching distfile as well. I have already started * > building packages on a controlled environment, and an upgrade at this * > stage means I have to go delete the package, all the links, both from * > thud and wcarchive, and the distfiles. * Excuse me to comment, but I think the problem is that the 2.1.1 version * is no longer available at the master FTP site... No, that's not a problem. That's why I said "on the CD, as long as we have a matching distfile as well". If we can't have a distfile on the CD (license restrictions etc.), it's a totally different situation, of course. Satoshi