From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 12:10:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C111DD7FB1 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416FB8083E for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id t37so19317705qtg.5 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 05:10:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KkwB3aLYZmN1EUzzRtqoqtSfA+/C6mWZWYn4gUN53BM=; b=VXespGOF1DJx32xQGE5/BE7Cce8Doao0B0yAmaupb2EFmLFqZi5GxdYbYsXSeqosLC h+H6XDA7qow5bQW8xYZ4FXfW0eHNIoy2XbrudO4giTw/tU+Ax7bj1q+CKCGpjHftfHPb apviGawfYcBVpf/B6MDeEGrsy51X6vfEVs9oBiU0Hpvh6rBMXP0thqY+g9PKc+yCUuB/ BCd6Li690k/Tlvvm+JOk5KWiFrJ623gfwWH+BHW/ICrT8OW6hHYa4Nt6n8oibOGD/E34 hjXSRwcUr/e+J5ix71gxFQpZi0EDknXUpYYoP0az4LmIevizMLYvM0d87dzBxcU+31BQ kRCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KkwB3aLYZmN1EUzzRtqoqtSfA+/C6mWZWYn4gUN53BM=; b=E4iQaBeaAkBu98AImf5rI390/X1lT84aNb2jqSNQhWyPvRiUGoREPco1zeYvKNe/RG HmMstmq43jekBkYba74cHTnT4LI0VvtVLEj98FHbfRxKEf4EuDd6jnXAKIi8Rl13Rkpg Qk6u8tfH1hrKwAk0YiR+jkMg96MosrKBESv2oCq335spfzjSMeWCqWP4/Ps2urFqbZxm 8sw/9tMT3r1b/l4RvYAkqOXUiP4MnfqMPbTOcFE1yX5taIiDZSavAtze6SezbePWM0Le N8vo3N3uQqhDWoPyvKJofUc/mR1PxcfE/SJW6PcpPYiN1FkNUAmzdMpJouu2aHlI3OlB xLug== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h0wqY8aJaPSp8fPdz3+YyEt5oKQQONj1F1indH+SUf2dvHXUzh 3r3FgKAcdWpkpdlDRtIaGHmzYjonmrJR/08= X-Received: by 10.200.3.220 with SMTP id z28mr1964503qtg.35.1502885434328; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 05:10:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.173.188 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 05:10:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5e642437-f60f-295e-bfbc-a5aab501636d@julf.com> References: <126aaff1-58af-f7d5-b47e-c7d894b45606@gmail.com> <917955d1-faf8-854c-d4c0-b2e6ef957314@julf.com> <5e642437-f60f-295e-bfbc-a5aab501636d@julf.com> From: Michael Schuster Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:10:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS and free space To: Johan Helsingius , freeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:10:35 -0000 On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Johan Helsingius wrote: > > according to the output you showed, it must be in zpool/home ... Marko's > > suggestion is definitely a good one! > > Yes - seems it is in zroot/usr I beg to differ: zroot/usr /usr no 4.17T 140K 1.09x lz4 REFER is 140K - that's almost nothing compared to what you're "missing". > > That symbolic link seem to be part of the default install. > > If so, IMO that's a decision that would at least require some > > explanation to "naive" users (like me). However, can you try to (re)move > > it for now and see what you can learn? > > Removed it temporarily, no change (and it wasn't masking anything). > > define "no change" - from what you showed previously, there must have been a change because /home was a link to /usr/home ... maybe zfs list output won't change, but I'd expect the output of "ls -las" for /home/storage to show something different from /usr/home/storage now ... *Hmm...# zfs mount zroot/usrcannot mount 'zroot/usr': 'canmount' property is set to 'off'* you can change that property, but it's probably not worth the effort (see what I wrote above). regards Michael -- Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ recursion, n: see 'recursion'