Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:11:42 +0800
From:      Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, x11@freebsd.org
Cc:        =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=sFHyEdRn7eU19rObJf0_M0g-pT0i8EEK0Zc0K@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110324200614.GW85668@acme.spoerlein.net>
References:  <AANLkTimuxnfb6ys%2Bx9GFRrQvNOdje6TTP-L7jgDkWBqZ@mail.gmail.com> <20110324200614.GW85668@acme.spoerlein.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
so can u guys please come back to the review of the ports for the categorie
move?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein <uqs@freebsd.org> wro=
te:

> On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> > do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> > largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
> > spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers category, with only
> > 10 ports, will be folded into regular x11 category.
>
> Why? I can understand you'd like to move the handful of x11-servers into
> x11, but what do you gain by splitting www?
>
> The time and repo-churn could probably be spent on something more
> constructive than moving ports around.
>
> Uli -- "Hierarchies don't work!"
>



--=20
+-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+
With best Regards,
        Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org)

Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=sFHyEdRn7eU19rObJf0_M0g-pT0i8EEK0Zc0K>