From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 16 13:53:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B316A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:53:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29F6643D46
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:53:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 13071 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2005 13:49:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130)
  by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 16 Jan 2005 13:49:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 25220 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2005 13:54:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98)
  by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jan 2005 13:54:18 -0000
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1217E11698;
	Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:53:40 +0200 (EET)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:53:39 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
Message-ID: <20050116155339.7a9c29c0@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050116074724.GA72796@0lsen.net>
References: <20050116013239.GA84616@0lsen.net>
	<20050116041659.GA62683@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20050116074724.GA72796@0lsen.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Portversion claims a newer port is available but it ain't so
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:53:45 -0000

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:47:24 -0800
Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net> wrote:

> On Jan 15, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > But the ports tree *does* have 1.1.0_4.  You probably did 'make
> > fetchindex', which works against the latest ports tree.  cvsup and you'll
> > get the update.
> 
> Actually, I didn't do a make fetchindex, but it seems as if portversion
> does this at times.  At any rate, you were right.  Running cvsup pulls down
> the latest port.

It does if you dont have the index file (e.g. it was deleted by cvsup).

I find useful to use sysutils/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex after cvsuping to
have my index up-to-date and sync with local installed ports


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"