From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 19 22:30:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB4D16A420 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA4443D45 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:30:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c2so506620ugf for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:30:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BOb57muGMAWbhMKhIL4QVIEzuSK+4lqIR9wGe5PxLgcfRN3xLR10V1+FFy6QhUtEWuR+VCO2B2nEJb0zfw3mi5Lwi0jC8LZEGh2GVTvomCk8v1MwCBVlOTZ59QYKciaq5lL2gFOs7q26AoYPuRPh2izFpXYkyDnDKYugVXl9SBk= Received: by 10.66.242.15 with SMTP id p15mr1539594ugh; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:30:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.220.5 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:30:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:30:46 -0500 From: "David Stanford" To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: BSD License "Innocence" Clause Proposal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:30:49 -0000 So, if I understand this correctly, you basically want a license that asks that your name be mentioned if/when someone modifies your work and then republishes it, but with no real boundaries? Why not just publish your work and ask that those who use it for their own benefit just acknowledge your portion of it? I don't know, maybe I missed something... -David On 3/19/06, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > I'm not sure if I should start advocating the idea here. > Some people must've had this thought before I ever > did, I hope they will support me. > > We need a special clause in the license we release > our work under. I'm not a lawyer, but I understand that > it will be very hard to devise and formulate. Basically, > it should state that under no circumstances and under > no legislation should ever any entity be punished for > breaking the license terms. > > I just can't sleep tight when a man can get sued and > prosecuted because he copied a piece of my work > without mentioning my name, whatever his motives > are. At the same time, I respect my work and the work > of other, and appreciate a way to state that names > should be mentioned. > > So we need a "law", that can be followed and can > be broken, but can't be enforced. > > What do you think, guys? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >