From owner-freebsd-security Sat Jan 8 17:46:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3F614FA5 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 17:46:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id CAA12250 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:46:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA23500 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:44:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: dump over ssh Date: 9 Jan 2000 02:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <858p5j$mu3$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <854v9q$1gf9$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Christian Weisgerber wrote: > # dump -0aP ssh -f host:/dev/nrsa0 / BTW, I just noticed that the Linux port of dump contains equivalent functionality. No additional flag there, but the environment variable RSH is checked. Opinions on which approach is preferable? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message