From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 02:27:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1001065673 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA958FC12 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from localhost (pool-72-81-42-28.phlapa.east.verizon.net [72.81.42.28]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECDC5C207; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:27:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:25:13 -0500 From: Yoshihiro Ota To: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIEvDtnZlc2TDoW4=?= Message-Id: <20081118212513.a37f9f58.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <491929C1.1070002@FreeBSD.org> References: <20081111010958.da6924e8.ota@j.email.ne.jp> <491929C1.1070002@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ota@j.email.ne.jp, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jakarta-tomcat v.s. tomcat X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:27:11 -0000 On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:44:17 +0100 Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > Yoshihiro Ota escribió: > > Hello, forks. > > > > There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following. > > > > % ls -d */*tomcat* > > java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41 > > www/jakarta-tomcat4 www/tomcat55 > > www/jakarta-tomcat5 www/tomcat6 > > www/tomcat-native > > > > When I diffed ver. 5 dirs, they looked similar except versions. > > Does anyone know the differences between jakarta-tomcat and tomcat under the ports? > > > Afaik, it used to be known as Jakarta-Tomcat, but its new name is > Tomcat. If you observe it well www/tomcat41 and www/tomcat55 are much > newer version than www/jakarta-tomcat4 and www/jakarta-tomcat5 and there > isn't even www/jakarta-tomcat6. I suggest you should just use > www/tomcat6. I'm also planning to use it and I succeeded to install it > without problems and I can reach it through the port 8180. Indeed, that is one of the answer I had expected. So, if www/tomcat* are the new ones, why don't we remove www/jakarta-tomcat*? Hiro