From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr  2 08:00:57 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46C0FB4
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  2 Apr 2015 08:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA70964
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  2 Apr 2015 08:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3280vjD074605
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:00:57 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199109] Regression seen with ncurses on 11-current
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:00:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: misc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-199109-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:00:57 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199109

            Bug ID: 199109
           Summary: Regression seen with ncurses on 11-current
           Product: Base System
           Version: 11.0-CURRENT
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: misc
          Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: marino@FreeBSD.org

I don't know if it was the last update to ncurses or an earlier one, but the
port devel/adacurses builds with base ncurses on FreeBSD 8,9,10 but not 11:

http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/head-amd64-default/2015-03-19_00h08m00s/logs/errors/adacurses-20110404_3.log

The port was previously using ncurses from ports, so the failures started after
switching to base ncurses.

Can somebody tell me if there is an unintended regression on base, or if
adacurses simply requires ncurses from ports now?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.