Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:58:57 -0600
From:      Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, arch@freebsd.org, smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tidying up the interrupt registration process 
Message-ID:  <200007190358.VAA09445@berserker.bsdi.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

}That's what I thought.  Does anybody else see a reason to convert fast
}interrupts into threads?

	The short answer is no, you absolutely don't want to
convert them to fully instantiated threads, especially when you
only have a heavy wait solution. There is another middle ground
that is less clear, and it depends partially on what you deem a
thread. If you just switch the stack pointer and curproc, but use
spin locks and don't allow for a context switch are you converting
it to a thread. At this point the statistical stuff will charge
time properly to interrupts rather than user processes, or other
kernel processes, you also don't have to worry about pathological
cases blowing out the stack.


Chuck




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007190358.VAA09445>