From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 5 5:40:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from spider.suxx.eu.org (unknown [194.249.141.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C276437B403; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 05:40:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from maddave@suxx.eu.org) Received: by spider.suxx.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B25F17771; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:41:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.suxx.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7520232B9E; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:41:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:41:43 +0200 (CEST) From: David Delibasic To: Alessandro de Manzano Cc: , Subject: Re: NFS and WAN ? In-Reply-To: <20010805134110.A96445@libero.sunshine.ale> Message-ID: <20010805144104.W34298-100000@spider.suxx.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm running NFS over IPsec tunnel and it works fine.. D. On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Alessandro de Manzano wrote: > Hello! > > I'm looking for a way to establish a _secure_ NFS connection in a WAN / > Internet environment. > > I know NFS is not secure from this point of view, so I would ask if > someone have a solution. > > Encapsulating over SSH is not easy with all the different ports > needed by NFS, so what I could do ? > > Maybe running it over something like IPSec, VPNs, etc. ? > > Better alternatives ? > > > Thanks a lot! > > > -- > > bye! > > Alessandro de Manzano > Milano, Italy > > ale@unixmania.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message