From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 21:32:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E30116A4B3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5FA43F3F for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from fortytwo ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20031023043204.DKAV16588.lakemtao05.cox.net@fortytwo> for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:32:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:30:51 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031022233051.35334074.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: TCO and etc arguement X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:32:10 -0000 Well recently got talking with a MSCE about the total cost of ownership of running something like FreeBSD. Any one have any comments on this or any thing that would be useful to bring up? My view on this is how could it not be cheaper since for the most part it just requires some one that knows how to properly set it up. It can be setup to automatically update it's self. No trouble some licsensing. No company hell bent on feature creep. Easy access to source code. Easy administation. Easy expansion. UNIX admins are no longer a problem to find.