Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:17:20 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 284793] [new port] net-im/tuba: Browse the Fediverse
Message-ID:  <bug-284793-7788-3dIuZALrz4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-284793-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-284793-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D284793

--- Comment #6 from Yusuf Yaman <nxjoseph@protonmail.com> ---
(In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #5)

> You may need to first strip and then hard link as strip may break hard li=
nks.
That said, if the original binary is stripped, there's no reason to strip t=
he
link.  It's the same file after all.

Portlint said me to do so, they have the same file size, so i don't need to=
 do
it?

> I'll go fix that on commit if needed.

Thanks.


> A build test reveals that a dependency is missing:
> Dependency gtksourceview-5 found: NO. Found 5.4.2 but need: '>=3D5.6.0'

I added a PR to "Depends on" list which would update gtksourceview5 because=
 it
is so old and Tuba requires gtksourceview5>=3D5.6.0, actually i was said th=
at i
patched gtksourceview5 to 5.6.0 locally.

> I recommend you test your ports with Poudriere to check if all required d=
ependencies are listed.

Thanks but I already do so.

> Portlint recommends to make the gettext dependency conditional on an NLS =
knob.  > Would this work for this port?

I don't think so because I didn't see a  configurable NLS option in my port.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-284793-7788-3dIuZALrz4>