Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:59:46 -0500
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] bsd.port.mk: Record OPTIONS into /var/db/pkg on install
Message-ID:  <501FDBE2.2040105@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <501FD6CD.5030303@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <501C71A8.4080505@FreeBSD.org> <501F7994.305@FreeBSD.org> <501FC7D4.6020504@FreeBSD.org> <501FD6CD.5030303@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/6/2012 9:38 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 06:34 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 8/6/2012 3:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I would also like to see us embed the distfile information, either in
>>> +CONTENTS or in its own file. This information is very useful for tools
>>> like portmaster to better handle automated distfile cleanup.
>>>
>>> hth,
>>
>> I like that idea. My only feedback is to make the auto-delete on
>> deinstall be optional in bsd.port.mk. They may turnaround and reinstall
>> it right away and not want to waste the bandwidth again.
>>
>> Makes sense for port building tools to wipe the old files on upgrade!
> 
> Sorry I wasn't clear, I use the information on the old package to delete
> the old distfiles, after first comparing to the list of distfiles used
> by other ports to make sure that it isn't in use elsewhere (such as QT).
> 

Ah I see my confusion now.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106483

I saw the $RM lines in deinstall and didn't look close enough. They are
just removing the distfile list, not the actual files.


Regards,
Bryan




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501FDBE2.2040105>