From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 06:05:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914A8F12; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 06:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688B971B; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 06:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Xins-MacBook-Pro-2.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:83bf:0:409a:fe1:5d8d:55ad]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D1611C3B7; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:05:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1360303514; bh=5SsnPrKc/gQoPDnY61Za5z8hu34ccdRaOqEaFTVB2Uc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=eDzg3tZiCup9pePV1dsnrjWTKrrrPj9zDq5Cv4O9zraIcGrTIp/uwRuZjDtD6tRei UDt2QwArGN3+28elkFos03dgU+G2sQnH7tfANWv7Gf0NAFir0foBK8glG4s3FmiMUC AtWLymt/BbO8TTS7F5j8cLhmfysk4G1QTbMfYLCE= Message-ID: <51149599.7060503@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:05:13 -0800 From: Xin Li Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: Do we really need articles/cvs-freebsd anymore? References: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn> In-Reply-To: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:05:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2/7/13 9:53 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that everything (src, ports, doc) has moved off CVS, does it > make sense to keep articles/cvs-freebsd around anymore? I think > it's probably better to point people away from ncvs/dcvs-style > setups. > > It may also be worth replacing the cvs-freebsd article with > something that talks about subversion, or even some of the git > repositories mentioned in https://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow - > but this can be done separately. > > So what do you think, is it ok to 'svn rm' the cvs-freebsd/ article > and then look into replacing it with something more modern? CVS is still being used in internal repositories including re@ and secteam@, it's easy to set up and works fine for small groups. I think writing new articles should take higher priority than removing old ones, especially when there is no new article that acts similar role of the old ones... Just my $0.02 Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRFJWZAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzXXcH/1OjHM7lwiBuMlGtel9PCcNf zSxX5V4rKWa5VRmNSkpyl9S/ZzRMRGq+bdsU6roexklg9Y91adVSmGD2gLg+0MCy JcWP8JOBIL/+XPOF3c8lyp1HfqusO9eoJF4HhwIKo2f32S4dcHSDf69NhMoPvVIY xSPRQgMkH0tCySlP2cGpQ2P4/4mPe5RyIHFilfagTCaaWHywhWQl8fV64KLkHDiL 8IaR2Dwt0dCAQMOkqXa6YXGv5J4qHOgZOkgWBLOb11X4adDgtRSfCWJAfy+xXRpp rqwGTdZAmGypT8kxfseJniT9B3Rnq/8DT5O/B5p7RcbmLGbsFDWdsC49gpZDmD4= =Yua0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----