From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 15 21:55: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F3637B606; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA47759; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:54:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSH 2.1 In-Reply-To: <19218.958452719@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > I wonder if we even have to have it be part of the crypto distribution > in such an event. I always thought it would have been nice if it > could have come with the bindist, and if it doesn't have any "crypto" > dependencies or bits which explicitly *require* its' continued > segregation into the crypto dist, maybe we could move it over? Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the crypto distribution as long as we have one. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message