From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 11:24:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB81516A418; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C08213C455; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DEA2089; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:24:49 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1834C2085; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:24:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDC1984485; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:24:48 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: John Birrell References: <200711232354.lANNsjmU040755@repoman.freebsd.org> <47476A52.8040508@FreeBSD.org> <20071124001008.GA44735@what-creek.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:24:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20071124001008.GA44735@what-creek.com> (John Birrell's message of "Sat\, 24 Nov 2007 00\:10\:08 +0000") Message-ID: <861wad5jwf.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway , John Birrell , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/binutils/opcodes ppc-dis.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:24:59 -0000 John Birrell writes: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:03:30AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Usually we try to avoid taking files off the vendor branch, it > > causes trouble for the person doing the vendor imports :( > I think it's a change that doesn't need to be merged. If a new version is > imported, _that_ needs to be build clean. Changes that don't need to be merged are normally committed to the vendor branch. Having a file off the vendor branch will cause trouble during future imports regardless of whether there are changes to merge. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no