From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 18:50:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B627106574C for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F83A8FC1A for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id q5OIocd9026122 for arm@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:50:38 GMT (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.143] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id num3xsxt7mvs4p6fwmqyvka6pn; for arm@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) From: Tim Kientzle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:50:37 -0700 Message-Id: To: arm@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: Subject: Removing ARM_WANT_TP_ADDRESS hack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:50:46 -0000 What is the story behind ARM_WANT_TP_ADDRESS? It's defined right now in some kernel configs, which implies that it's a system-specific configuration. But as far as I can tell from the code, it's really a CPU-specific setting that should always be enabled for < armv6. Any objections to replacing #ifdef ARM_WANT_TP_ADDRESS with #if =85 < armv6 =85 (I'm working on a clean way to do the latter.) I think this would simply eliminate ARM_WANT_TP_ADDRESS from the codebase. Tim