From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 10 19:48:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27D9147E20 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46q1qR0W7Tz4VVC for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1570736930; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=ztenMQy9n8Xv/vUxZFYrAeJ5v/c=; b=WtL1wCnYkkgROM9Y96zegjhqLzwBaPR/gquty4DfN7A98embfO3KOpKU+VWIa933 Kz77vz2WNwGqslgFT35cH1JXeopBEygB9Z+OHj6cwAB1W/4cZvwAsT98rvAt091Q v08e4/2FGIebKSUSql5O9fx5EiBhQmQ6yOQKb0fAVraeE7YHa2pQVf6rmXbBlyb7 2f2D6gKEsTtHR8LjjWRPhghTqxn3Q79ZSIS1BGXzpSPTAcoI1i7B9Uk+YnkH2tzg Lr78D/MBN1PAW8B+ppxyx+Y72rFT7kxyrHsa4kpnUW57Of8XdU27aO8cszK1yGs0 vb5yFF+9JUlAIiLzsAtWjg==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=EOJ4LGRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:117 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=XRQyMpdBKAEA:10 a=XobE76Q3jBoA:10 a=48faUk6PgeAA:10 a=0vHLZ4ERTf5LQAVlvDkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:45563] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 5F/5C-24678-12B8F9D5; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:48:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <23967.35617.571449.908018@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:48:49 -0400 From: Robert Huff To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , Jan Beich , Yasuhiro KIMURA , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? In-Reply-To: References: <20191007.151841.1094708479149685365.yasu@utahime.org> <8spu-p72a-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20191009101412.lwxyqcdaqtsvq2ym@ivaldir.net> <20191009143048.zliwcrjx7ahe67a7@ivaldir.net> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46q1qR0W7Tz4VVC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=WtL1wCnY; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.80)[ip: (-9.45), ipnet: 69.168.97.0/24(0.01), asn: 36271(0.49), country: US(-0.05)]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.97.168.69.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:48:51 -0000 Andrea Venturoli writes: > I'm building without IPv6, just because it's one (currently > useless) less thing to worry about (settings, security, etc...). Phrased differently: one less possible failure mode. Respectfully, Robert Huff