From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 14:03:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93C716A4CE; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:03:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv01.sparkit.no (srv01.sparkit.no [193.69.116.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06FC43D2D; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws.nada ([193.69.114.88]) by srv01.sparkit.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iATE3P1Z086634; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:03:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws.nada (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws.nada (8.12.9/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iATE2On4074542; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:02:24 GMT (envelope-from eivind@ws.nada) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by ws.nada (8.12.9/8.12.10/Submit) id iATE2OFp074541; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:02:24 GMT (envelope-from eivind) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:02:23 +0000 From: Eivind Eklund To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20041129140223.GA73964@FreeBSD.org> References: <200411290132.iAT1WAse056942@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411290132.iAT1WAse056942@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/loader Makefile loader.rc X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:03:31 -0000 On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:32:10AM +0000, Scott Long wrote: > scottl 2004-11-29 01:32:10 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/boot/i386/loader Makefile > Removed files: > sys/boot/i386/loader loader.rc > Log: > Disable the beastie menu. It offends some and annoys everyone else, and I'm > frankly tired of the controversy. When people ask me why FreeBSD isn't user- > friendly, I'll tell them that I tried. RIP. I've for a long time been thinking of the benefits of creating a "user friendliness officer" similar to the security officer / tech advisory board we have now. In other words: Give the authority to somebody to Just Decide. As it is, we end up with bikesheds over UI issues all the time, grumbling, and a user interface that's the result of who shouts loudest. We also end up with developers that are less-than-motivated to work on anything user interface related, because we know we'll just get shouted at no matter what we do... Eivind.