From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Aug 28 11:53:45 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA20107
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 11:53:45 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA20101
          ; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 11:53:42 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id EAA10488; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 04:50:56 +1000
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 04:50:56 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199508281850.EAA10488@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: gibbs@freefall.FreeBSD.org, hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 16, 32, and 64bit types?
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>that will always be 32bits.  NetBSD has u_int32 and 
>friends for this type of task.  Do we have anything
>similar?  If not, I think we should.  What would it
>take to bring in the extra types?

We have u_int32_t etc. in <sys/types.h> (actually in
<machine/types.h>.  u_int32 would pollute the namespace.

Bruce