From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Mon Apr 20 11:46:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052012C04AE for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495PzS6R68z4CBx for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DB0A72C04AD; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: python@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE42C04AC for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495PzS59Npz4CBv for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A89AAEE61 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03KBkCG1098696 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 03KBkC1l098694 for python@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230140] textproc/py-sphinx: Update to 1.8.1 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: python@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:46:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230140 --- Comment #16 from Li-Wen Hsu --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #15) I'm fine for having the dependency line in the Makefile of individual port (maybe I'm more prefer to that.) I want to point out that this ticket gets stuck because of it's not that ea= sy to fix all the fallouts of the upgrade, but there are new ports want to be added because of needing new sphinx (ex: bug233010 ), which is the least th= ing I want to see. I suggest: - Let's get a new exp-run or just do a self poudriere build against the 3.0= .2 (IIRC some of the fallouts in comment5 got fixed by newer version (1.8.x = in that time), but I forgot to mention in that comment) - For fallouts, let's check if them needs 1.8.x or other fixes, or even can= be deprecated. And I suggest we can set a time to revise (and deprecate) 1.8.x along with python 2 in ports. Any comments? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=