From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 4 17:23:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D6B230 for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D281AD5 for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t44HN431084723 for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:23:04 GMT (envelope-from daemon-user@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from daemon-user@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t44HN47f084722; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:23:04 GMT (envelope-from daemon-user) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 17:23:04 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D2357: Port x86 busdma to ARM64 Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D2357: Port x86 busdma to ARM64 X-Herald-Rules: <34> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MGY3ZjQ1YWY5OGJjZWFlYzE0YWJhYTBhN2U5IFVHqvg= Precedence: bulk X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 17:23:05 -0000 zbb added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2357#43295, @andrew wrote: > The lack of cache handling makes this unusable for a large amount of hardware that doesn't have cache-coherent DMA. The commit description has already said that and we have ARM64TODOs in the file. This commit is still less unusable than the previous implementation. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2357 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: zbb, emaste, ian, imp, andrew Cc: onwahe-gmail-com, emaste, freebsd-arm