From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 17:23:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531F616A4E9 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 17:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8A143D45 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 17:23:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.21] (rat.samsco.home [192.168.254.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j49HS2pe029456; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:28:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <427F9C44.8080704@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 11:22:12 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050321 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ewan Todd References: <20050509150018.GF281@mathcode.net> <427F8076.7030105@samsco.org> <20050509170316.GG281@mathcode.net> <427F9890.7010104@samsco.org> <20050509172111.GH281@mathcode.net> In-Reply-To: <20050509172111.GH281@mathcode.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Performance issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:23:08 -0000 Ewan Todd wrote: >>5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather >>expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP >>turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with >>SMP turned off? >> > > > I'm pretty sure there's no SMP in this kernel. > > #cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > #fgrep SMP MYKERNEL > # > > GENERIC has no SMP in it, but there's a second "GENERIC" kernel conf > called "SMP", which simply says: > > include GENERIC > options SMP > > However, sysctl seems to show smp not active, but not disabled. Is > that anything to worry about? > > #sysctl -a | grep smp > kern.smp.maxcpus: 1 > kern.smp.active: 0 > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > kern.smp.cpus: 1 > debug.psmpkterrthresh: 2 > > > -e > Bah, you're right, sorry for the confusion. Too many releases in my mind, they all seem like a blur. Scott