From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 6 19:34:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101A016A4CE for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:34:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avout1.midco.net (avout1.midco.net [24.220.0.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7E743D39 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@beforever.com) Received: (qmail 24951 invoked by uid 1009); 6 Feb 2005 19:34:54 -0000 Received: from pete@beforever.com by avout1 by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. Clear:RC:1(24.220.214.66):. Processed in 0.011994 secs); 06 Feb 2005 19:34:54 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: pete@beforever.com via avout1 X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.22 (Clear:RC:1(24.220.214.66):. Processed in 0.011994 secs) Received: from host-66-214-220-24.midco.net (HELO [10.0.0.3]) ([24.220.214.66]) (envelope-sender ) by avout1.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Feb 2005 19:34:54 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> References: <8220c29b8ffacbd574cc9c26fe18d25b@bis.midco.net> <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd@beforever.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter Schultz Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:34:53 -0600 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:09:50 +0000 Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:34:58 -0000 On Feb 6, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > The good points about FreeBSD obscurity are: > > CVSUP access > ftp download access > > If *everyone* used FreeBSD the above points would suck and I'd have to > move to a different OS. > > Your argument is flawed because there'd simply be that many more mirrors to choose from. Besides, it sounds like CVSUP will soon be replaced by something much more efficient. Pete...