Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:34:53 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pete@beforever.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD Message-ID: <68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd@beforever.com> In-Reply-To: <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050206132109.55669F-100000@fledge.watson.org> <8220c29b8ffacbd574cc9c26fe18d25b@bis.midco.net> <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 6, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > The good points about FreeBSD obscurity are: > > CVSUP access > ftp download access > > If *everyone* used FreeBSD the above points would suck and I'd have to > move to a different OS. > > Your argument is flawed because there'd simply be that many more mirrors to choose from. Besides, it sounds like CVSUP will soon be replaced by something much more efficient. Pete...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd>