From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 25 21:58: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from coffee.q9media.com (coffee.q9media.com [216.94.229.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E6837B403 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mike@localhost) by coffee.q9media.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f9Q51iJ98845; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 01:01:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 01:01:43 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft To: "David O'Brien" Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import bawk? Re: NO_AWK Message-ID: <20011026010143.J93553@coffee.q9media.com> References: <200110250153.f9P1rd0H071528@atg.aciworldwide.com> <20011024211434.G15052@elvis.mu.org> <20011025135022.A80517@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011025135022.A80517@dragon.nuxi.com>; from dev-null@NUXI.com on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 01:50:22PM -0700 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David O'Brien writes: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:14:34PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Is bawk a BSD licensed version of awk? What about replacing gawk with > > bawk? Any drawbacks? > > bawk is license friendly for us. I've gotten all the gawk'isms out of > our tree and have run bawk as my system awk for a while. Want me to just > do the vendor import and cut us over? I'm in favour of this, as a -CURRENT only thang. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message