Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 17:19:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: ark@eltex.ru, oppermann@pipeline.ch, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ipfilter@postbox.anu.edu.au Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02.9809211718310.16487-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <199809211924.VAA02879@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > no, this is not true, but just because dummynet does a different -- > easier, in a sense -- thing. The reason why you saw dummynet coming in > together with device driver patches is that at the same time i also > added support for bridging, and that _did_ require working at the > device driver (actually, it might have been done in ether_input() but > with some loss of efficiency, and since there efficiency is critical i > thought it was better to go as low as reasonably possible). Ah! I remember now. :) You are correct. I had not intended to lump your code with ALTQ the way I did. :) -- | Matthew N. Dodd |This space | '78 Datsun 280Z | FreeBSD/NetBSD/Sprite/VMS | | winter@jurai.net |is for rent| '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,m68k,pmax,vax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | Are you k-rad elite enough for my webpage? | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02.9809211718310.16487-100000>