From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 16 07:19:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F024216A41C for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F3643D45 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so8414wra for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=i4DqDkn9thEh1EB+PFfbsSJrzBAAAB38OS/VWqnK3BbaBEJMK/gIAJFoRBdKABSlleegCydPAxnPOEG/8SJAT/kjgKsEvxaRKeGVyu0lXUfLiaSjVbEkLDWnfhFftEfMzZIP/FJ5TKoCvPyAvjRlNGOxuX3cUBrpIZjuZZmewSQ= Received: by 10.54.47.67 with SMTP id u67mr1359872wru; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:19:30 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: RAID Level 55 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:19:32 -0000 I was reading on wikipedia about RAIDs trying to pass the time and I was thinking why not have RAID 5+5 or 5+5+5 levels, sure you waste 2/3th's of your space but wouldn't this be a killer setup for a directory server where fast reads are of the utmost importance? Would you add up the transfer rates for each drive to get the total transfer rate of the array?, if true you could easily saturate a 10 gigabit ethernet connection with a 555 array of IDE or SATA drives. Anyways... I was just trying to pass the time :-) Also, why can't we apply the concepts of RAIDs onto x86 PCs for a RAIC?