From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 16 23:13:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCEF106566B; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: "M. Warner Losh" Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:12:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <201007131657.o6DGvq9L097594@svn.freebsd.org> <201007161514.04955.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20100716.154216.582095686063971712.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20100716.154216.582095686063971712.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007161912.53042.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, brde@optusnet.com.au Subject: Re: svn commit: r210005 - head/sys/modules/acpi/acpi X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:13:04 -0000 On Friday 16 July 2010 05:42 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <201007161514.04955.jkim@FreeBSD.org> > > Jung-uk Kim writes: > : On Thursday 15 July 2010 08:04 am, Bruce Evans wrote: > : > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > : > > Log: > : > > Define SMP unconditionally for amd64 and remove opt_global.h > : > > from SRCS. Note it is done just for correctness sake because > : > > we do not build, ship, or support acpi.ko on amd64. > : > > > : > > Prodded by: bde > : > > : > Thanks. > : > > : > It was much more interesting than I noticed. Modules are > : > supposed to be independent of all configuration options, > : > especially global ones, especially especially SMP. Perhaps > : > this is too much to ask for acpi. Does it work now, after you > : > removed an SMP ifdef from it? > : > : I removed "#ifdef SMP" from acpi.c because 'smp_started' is > : available for both UP and SMP kernels. On the other hand, I > : cannot remove these easily from sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c, > : i.e., it requires some symbols from sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c, > : which are only available in SMP case. > : > : FYI, we never had to worry about acpi.ko on i386 because we > : didn't implement suspend/resume for SMP case in the first place. > : X-) > > Does this mean we do implement it on amd64 now? I may have to > start trying to use it again... Yes, I did that for a while ago. 8-) Jung-uk Kim