From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jul 15 15:30:57 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA22913
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 15:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ref.tfs.com ([206.245.251.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA22904
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 15:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA27937; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 15:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607152228.PAA27937@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Adding reboot/exit callouts.. comments please
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 15:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: "JULIAN Elischer" <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199607152215.PAA09454@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Jul 15, 96 03:15:20 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Any possibility of generalizing this?
> 
> It's pretty obvious that we could implement SYSV IPC/SHM/Semaphores
> as an LKM IFF:
> 
> o	There was an __exit method registration mechanism
> 
> o	There was a __fork method registration mechanism
> 
> o	There wasn an __exec method registration mechanism
certainly I agree with this..
> 
[.. more agreed with stuff deleted]

julian