From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 6 11:33:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B0C159B1; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:33:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA24831; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 19:56:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Brad Knowles Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates in latest build? References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 06 Sep 1999 19:56:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: Brad Knowles's message of "Mon, 6 Sep 1999 19:51:47 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brad Knowles writes: > Blargh. I followed the instructions on > , but didn't realize > that it was going to create a /etc/cvsupfile that had "." for a > default tag. Now I get to reset that to "RELENG_3" (which is what I > really wanted in the first place), and start all over again. More FUD. The supfile referenced in the "Staying Stable with FreeBSD" section of the handbook contains: # The following line is for 3-stable. If you want 2.2-stable, change # "RELENG_3" to "RELENG_2_2". *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_3 Please stop spreading such disinformation. It only comes across as an infantile attempt to cover up the fact that you didn't do your homework, and it damages the project's reputation as well as your own. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message