Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:54:26 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? Message-ID: <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838kts0QhA1Rvf=S-GCZK2quyfmUdJHUqn6J2-31F9aWXQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838kts0QhA1Rvf=S-GCZK2quyfmUdJHUqn6J2-31F9aWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if > the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will > thank you for that. Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but not run. python, bison, things like that, right? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F733432.4020902>