From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 02:38:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24F937B401 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:38:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frontend2.aha.ru (bird.zenon.net [213.189.198.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E3043FB1 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:38:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uitm@blackflag.ru) Received: from [195.2.90.70] (HELO slt.oz) by frontend2.aha.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 197864442; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 13:38:39 +0400 Received: (from uitm@localhost) by slt.oz (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA01103; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:40:46 +0400 (MSD) From: Andrey Alekseyev Message-Id: <200307090940.NAA01103@slt.oz> In-Reply-To: <200307090913.h699DnK3053575@lurza.secnetix.de> from Oliver Fromme at "Jul 9, 3 11:13:49 am" To: olli@secnetix.de (Oliver Fromme) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:40:40 +0400 (MSD) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS problem FreeBSD vs NetApp Filer using tomcat / java X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:38:44 -0000 Oliver, > It is my understanding that the interruptible flag has only > an effect when a signal is delivered to a process which is > blocked on NFS I/O. Or am I wrong? Do you use "i" or "s" option or both? With "c" you may try to turn off the dynamic retransmit timeout estimator and set timeout explicitly with "t". We faced a problem similar to yours when using "ci" for UDP mounts from FreeBSD client and Intel Solaris 8 server.