From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 21:50:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5F016A4EA for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:50:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.schluting.com (schluting.com [131.252.214.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1768843D2D for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlie@schluting.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.schluting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C761523F4 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:50:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.schluting.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (schluting.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02805-01 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:50:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [131.252.209.122] (smelly.cat.pdx.edu [131.252.209.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.schluting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04FC2280 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:50:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41EED614.4010505@schluting.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:50:12 -0800 From: Charlie Schluting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <41EECAC0.3000801@schluting.com> <20050119212500.Y91508@black.eros.office> In-Reply-To: <20050119212500.Y91508@black.eros.office> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by your mom at schluting.com Subject: Re: vlans changed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:50:30 -0000 Mike Wolman wrote: > > I had major grief with the em driver and vlans, > i have found by tcpdumping on the em0 interface > actually causes more problems. > > there are some more posts about this a couple of months ago, > > my resolution was to swap the em card for an fxp instead as > the box was in production and i didnt have other options. > > Mike. Yea.. I had that problem to. But this is a different box, and it was just "not working" rather than crashing. It does use a bpf constantly though.. hmm. I've got about 50,000 pps coming into this box from a cisco SPAN session, and using a 100bT card isn't really an option. -Charlie