From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jul 7 21:44: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ptd.net (mail1.ha-net.ptd.net [207.44.96.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38E4337BA39 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 21:44:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tms2@mail.ptd.net) Received: (qmail 23212 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 04:44:10 -0000 Received: from du74.cli.ptd.net (HELO mail.ptd.net) (204.186.33.74) by mail.ptd.net with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 04:44:10 -0000 Message-ID: <3966B177.805696E4@mail.ptd.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 00:43:35 -0400 From: "Thomas M. Sommers" Organization: None X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass Cc: chat@FreeBSD.org, advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Emulation (Was: No port of Opera?) References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000706190244.0483ad70@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20000706201218.04a99100@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20000706222258.046d9c00@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Brett Glass wrote: > > I'm certainly not going to trust a mission-critical, or even important, > application to emulation. I want to be able to get high-quality > commercial software which has been compiled and tested for the native > API and is supported on the platform I'm running. And that means native > code. If that is generally true, then the existence of Linux binary support will not deter vendors from porting to FreeBSD, because customers will not be using their products with the Linux layer. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message